Hypothetical Case

 

A certiorari writ (order) of a higher court is often initiated to a lower court with the perspective of forwarding all the needed information in order for a review to be implemented by the higher court. Such events are often undertaken by the Supreme Court of USA. On the other hand, Dimethyltryptamines (DMT) as a drug is very dangerous because of the fact that it can be extracted from the brain and grass blades. The drug is perceived as the most illegal and dangerous in terms of usage. The drugs that consist of DMT are made up of mushroom and Peyote. It is evident that the Supreme Court has offered a legal consent to the users to utilize the drug for religious ceremonies. Such a move by the Supreme Court is not wise as the contents of the federal government are against the move (Goldberg 12-13). The use of the drug should not be legalized as it has a lot of risks that are likely to demoralize the normal lifestyle of an individual. Thus, the paper will illustrate on the two reasons and a conclusion meant to sum up the entire content of the paper.

Reason Number 1

From a federal government’s point of view, it is relevant for the Supreme Court to reverse such a deal as the drug is likely to generate irrelevant outcomes in the community. The risks of using the drug are it leads to serious implications for an individual who has a background of ment

Hypothetical Case

A certiorari writ (order) of a higher court is often initiated to a lower court with the perspective of forwarding all the needed information in order for a review to be implemented by the higher court. Such events are often undertaken by the Supreme Court of USA. On the other hand, Dimethyltryptamines (DMT) as a drug is very dangerous because of the fact that it can be extracted from the brain and grass blades. The drug is perceived as the most illegal and dangerous in terms of usage. The drugs that consist of DMT are made up of mushroom and Peyote. It is evident that the Supreme Court has offered a legal consent to the users to utilize the drug for religious ceremonies. Such a move by the Supreme Court is not wise as the contents of the federal government are against the move (Goldberg 12-13). The use of the drug should not be legalized as it has a lot of risks that are likely to demoralize the normal lifestyle of an individual. Thus, the paper will illustrate on the two reasons and a conclusion meant to sum up the entire content of the paper.

Reason Number 1

From a federal government’s point of view, it is relevant for the Supreme Court to reverse such a deal as the drug is likely to generate irrelevant outcomes in the community. The risks of using the drug are it leads to serious implications for an individual who has a background of mental health issues. An example is with the case of a person who has a mental illness utilizing the drug as it can lead to worse situations where he or she can die in the process. Thus, it is significant for the Supreme Court to reverse the decision made. Another example is the outcome of using the drug is it leads to a process known as “tripping”, the event can lead to an individual harming himself or herself. Significantly, the perception here is that the Supreme Court has to put into consideration the mentioned risks and effects of utilizing the use of drugs that contain DMT and reverse the decision made. The move made by the Supreme Court needs to be reversed because the drug is perceived to cause the user hallucinate and even lead to a distorted view of objects and reality (Goldberg 23-27). With such expectations, it is better to avoid any possible outcomes that might derail the normal lifestyle of an individual by preventing instead of treating. The rationale for my perception is based on the fact that reversing the recently enacted consent will generate positive results both for the government and the citizens in terms of health and cost in medical services.

Reason number 2

I perceive that the Supreme Court should reverse its decision because the drug is being looked at by people as spiritual and safe drugs. Users are viewing the drug as safe because of the fact that they do not know that they can experience negative outcomes when either injected or consumed in food staffs. Therefore, the decision made by the Supreme Court for users to use the drug is likely to encourage or lure other users in using the drugs for their personal reasons other than religious ceremonies. The government will also be obliged to put aside capital meant to treat people who might have been affected by the drug because the possible long term causes are expensive (Goldberg 17-19).

Just like any other drug, the content of DMT is likely to lead to negative outcomes that can cause one to engage in negative acts so as to attain the drug. An example of some of the possible actions that can arise from using the drug entail youths stealing from their parents and also selling of properties meant for other purposes to attain the drug. Furthermore, the above mentioned effects of using the drug can also lead to gratifying and at times can be intense for the user to handle (Goldberg 32-36). The implication here is that the mentioned drugs should not be utilized as DMT is a substance that is likely to cause harm to the user especially if utilized in large quantities and within a long period of time. Thus, my perspective as a representative of the government is the Supreme Court needs to reverse its decision for a better community within the current users.

Recommendation

The best approach that needs to be utilized by the Supreme Court is to ensure that drugs that contain DMT are not used because of the effects that arise from either smoking, used in drinks or injecting the drug. The importance of evading such an event is that it will save the government and the state money that can be invested in other areas. Additionally, people need to be taught on the reasons as to why the drug should not be used so as to ensure that they understand the circumstances of utilizing the drug. The approach needs to be enumerated especially within the religious groups that use the drug for ceremonial purposes as they are the primary beneficiaries. Teaching users on the side effects will help them comprehend the reasons behind the disbandment of the newly initiated Writ of Certioriari. Furthermore, the government needs to restrict its import and manufacture within the United States so as to ensure that it is not accessed within the state. Significantly, the above proposed recommendations need to be put into consideration in order to help the Supreme Court understand the issue at hand.

Conclusion

To sum up: the paper enumerates in detail on the reason as to why the Supreme Court needs to reverse its decision of recommending usage of drugs that contain DMT for religious purposes. The reasons as to why the federal government is against the issue are because the approach can lead to negative outcomes especially within the user and the government as well. The primary reason is that users might engage in acts such as stealing especially the youth in order to attain the drug. On the other hand, the government will be liable for its citizens in terms of purchasing equipment and medical issues to treat the affected victims.

The rationale for the two reasons is based on the outcome of using the drug. Some of the effects that have been mentioned in the above paragraphs are hallucinating, vomiting and feeling pressurized and strong. The mentioned effects are not significant as they indicate that an individual does not behave in her or his normal lifestyle. Fundamentally it is a good document which the Supreme Court needs to consider so as ensuring that the citizens and the government as well are safe from any possible harm or negative feedback due to using drugs that contain DMT content.

al health issues. An example is with the case of a person who has a mental illness utilizing the drug as it can lead to worse situations where he or she can die in the process. Thus, it is significant for the Supreme Court to reverse the decision made. Another example is the outcome of using the drug is it leads to a process known as “tripping”, the event can lead to an individual harming himself or herself. Significantly, the perception here is that the Supreme Court has to put into consideration the mentioned risks and effects of utilizing the use of drugs that contain DMT and reverse the decision made. The move made by the Supreme Court needs to be reversed because the drug is perceived to cause the user hallucinate and even lead to a distorted view of objects and reality (Goldberg 23-27). With such expectations, it is better to avoid any possible outcomes that might derail the normal lifestyle of an individual by preventing instead of treating. The rationale for my perception is based on the fact that reversing the recently enacted consent will generate positive results both for the government and the citizens in terms of health and cost in medical services.

 Reason number 2

 I perceive that the Supreme Court should reverse its decision because the drug is being looked at by people as spiritual and safe drugs. Users are viewing the drug as safe because of the fact that they do not know that they can experience negative outcomes when either injected or consumed in food staffs. Therefore, the decision made by the Supreme Court for users to use the drug is likely to encourage or lure other users in using the drugs for their personal reasons other than religious ceremonies. The government will also be obliged to put aside capital meant to treat people who might have been affected by the drug because the possible long term causes are expensive (Goldberg 17-19).

 Just like any other drug, the content of DMT is likely to lead to negative outcomes that can cause one to engage in negative acts so as to attain the drug. An example of some of the possible actions that can arise from using the drug entail youths stealing from their parents and also selling of properties meant for other purposes to attain the drug. Furthermore, the above mentioned effects of using the drug can also lead to gratifying and at times can be intense for the user to handle (Goldberg 32-36). The implication here is that the mentioned drugs should not be utilized as DMT is a substance that is likely to cause harm to the user especially if utilized in large quantities and within a long period of time. Thus, my perspective as a representative of the government is the Supreme Court needs to reverse its decision for a better community within the current users.

 Recommendation

 The best approach that needs to be utilized by the Supreme Court is to ensure that drugs that contain DMT are not used because of the effects that arise from either smoking, used in drinks or injecting the drug. The importance of evading such an event is that it will save the government and the state money that can be invested in other areas. Additionally, people need to be taught on the reasons as to why the drug should not be used so as to ensure that they understand the circumstances of utilizing the drug. The approach needs to be enumerated especially within the religious groups that use the drug for ceremonial purposes as they are the primary beneficiaries. Teaching users on the side effects will help them comprehend the reasons behind the disbandment of the newly initiated Writ of Certioriari. Furthermore, the government needs to restrict its import and manufacture within the United States so as to ensure that it is not accessed within the state. Significantly, the above proposed recommendations need to be put into consideration in order to help the Supreme Court understand the issue at hand.

 Conclusion

 To sum up: the paper enumerates in detail on the reason as to why the Supreme Court needs to reverse its decision of recommending usage of drugs that contain DMT for religious purposes. The reasons as to why the federal government is against the issue are because the approach can lead to negative outcomes especially within the user and the government as well. The primary reason is that users might engage in acts such as stealing especially the youth in order to attain the drug. On the other hand, the government will be liable for its citizens in terms of purchasing equipment and medical issues to treat the affected victims.

 The rationale for the two reasons is based on the outcome of using the drug. Some of the effects that have been mentioned in the above paragraphs are hallucinating, vomiting and feeling pressurized and strong. The mentioned effects are not significant as they indicate that an individual does not behave in her or his normal lifestyle. Fundamentally it is a good document which the Supreme Court needs to consider so as ensuring that the citizens and the government as well are safe from any possible harm or negative feedback due to using drugs that contain DMT content.